Archive for March 29th, 2012

50 years since first breast implants

March 29, 2012

my first hand experience of breast implants was weird, she was a friend of a friend is how we met and we both shared working in the theater. she had large silicone implants, being a stage performer everything is exaggerated, her breasts were the same laying down as standing. they didn’t move they looked nice but i am sure she didn’t feel much sensation in them. she made lots of noise but somehow it rang false. i’ve never been attracted to large breast per se and i see women, models who conform to some weird playboy mag idea of booming basooms. don’t get me wrong i do love to play with breasts and that fine tuning knob on the end is neat. i am just opposed to implants. i’ve had partners who had small breasts and our sex life was fine, so size doesn’t impede that good sex. as people are so should breast be, all different. but this isn’t about me it’s about boobies and history.

It is 50 years since the first breast enlargement using silicone implants. Today it rates as the second-most popular form of cosmetic surgery worldwide, undergone by 1.5 million women in 2010.

It was spring 1962 when Timmie Jean Lindsey, a mother-of-six lay down on the operating table at Jefferson Davis hospital in Houston, Texas.

Over the next two hours, she went from a B to a C cup, in an operation that made history.

“I thought they came out just perfect… They felt soft and just like real breasts,” says Lindsey now aged 80.

“I don’t think I got the full results of them until I went out in public and men on the street would whistle at me.”

Though the operation boosted her self-confidence – and she enjoyed the extra attention – she had never planned to have a breast augmentation.

Timmie Jean Lindsey in 1962 before her operation (left), just after (centre) and today Timmie Jean before and just after her op, and today

Lindsey had been to hospital to get a tattoo removed from her breasts, and it was then that doctors asked if she would consider volunteering for this first-of-its-kind operation.

“I was more concerned about getting my ears pinned back… My ears stood out like Dumbo! And they said ‘Oh we’ll do that too.'” So a deal was struck.

read the rest of story here

just one mans opinion. i know breast are pretty important in this world, i personal like them natural. TASTY

 

 

 

 

Hands on article of the Lytro camera

March 29, 2012

There’s been a lot of buzz about the Lytro digital camera that promises you can shoot an image and focus it afterward. But how does it work? What are the images like? And can you really focus after the fact? Here’s a hands-on look at the Lytro.

A new camera has been in the news recently: the Lytro, a $399 camera that allows you to take a photo now, and focus — or refocus — later. Sounds provocative. But does it work? Is this something you should add to your camera bag? I’ve had the opportunity to use one for several weeks now, and I’m pretty gung-ho. Here’s why.

The Lytro uses a technique that is called plenoptic — or light field — photography. The camera captures all the light coming through the lens from all angles, striking an array of microlenses on its sensor. The camera’s inventor, Ren Ng, says that the Lytro captures 11 million “light rays” in every photo.

Here’s one thing to get out of the way: the “focus later” aspect of the Lytro happens in special software after the shoot. The 11 million pieces of data the camera captures are written to a proprietary file that you download to your computer. Once the photo is on your computer screen, you click on any part of the image to bring that point into focus. Click on another part of the same image, and that point comes into focus. Lytro calls these images “Living Pictures.” The first time you see one, and experiment with focus, you will be impressed by how unusual these photos are. Living Picture photos are perfect for viewing live on a Web site, blog post, Facebook page, or other online entity.

here’s the link at creative pro com.

jene